Solar companies demand compensation for feed-in tariff cuts


Three solar power companies have written to the government demanding £2.2 million in compensation after the feed-in tariff (FIT) incentive scheme controversy last year, which saw government cuts wreaking havoc on the industry.

The cuts to solar power subsidies, announced in October 2011, were announced with only a few weeks’ notice and meant that homeowners, community groups and businesses who installed solar panels under the FIT scheme, saw their rate reduced from the promised 43.3p per kWh of solar electricity generated to just 21p, cutting their returns from around 7% to 4%.

The government had argued that the cuts were needed as the cost of solar power had plummeted and that the subsidy scheme, inherited from the Labour government, was becoming too expensive for consumers – who would ultimately foot the bill. However the cuts were ruled to be unlawful by the high court in December 2011, a ruling that was upheld despite subsequent UK government appeals to the Supreme Court.

‘Letter before claim’

The companies demanding compensation have written a ‘letter before claim’ to the Department of Energy and Climate Change, saying the government’s action "caused major financial losses and materially harmed the confidence of both consumers and the industry". The letter does not mark a formal legal move, and Prospect Law, the firm representing the companies, has said that it hopes the government will settle out of court; however it is expected that the government will resist the claims and therefore face more legal action. The claimants have asked that the government respond within two weeks.

"Unfortunately the losses incurred as a result of the feed-in tariff cuts are very real," said Nick Keighley, founding director of Solarlec, one of the companies named in the letter. "Today we're respectfully asking that the department acknowledges its unlawful behaviour and rectifies the damage caused to the industry.”

The results of the action will be watched closely by the solar industry; any victory for the firms that results in damages being paid could set a precedent that would allow other companies to also seek compensation, particularly given the large numbers of firms reporting falling sales and lost contracts. However, there are also divisions within the solar industry itself, between those companies that are keen to move on from the events of last year and those who feel the government has not done enough to compensate the firms affected.

 

 

Useful links:

Business Green article on the letter of claim

Guardian article on the high court ruling

Tags: UK | Clean Energy |

Comments (0)

Please login or register to comment.

Get investment advice

Speak to a specialist adviser for help in choosing the right green or ethical investment.



Request contact

or call 020 7812 1460

Holden & Partners



Worldwise Investor on your smart phone: find out more

Carol Wongall articles

Carol Wong is a freelance writer for Worldwise Investor.


News keyword search


News by category

News by month

News by author

RSS  Latest news comments 24 comments

Unregulated Collective Investment schemes (UCIS) - Why use them and what do you need to know?

And so now the FSA are looking to ban UCIS for retail investors. See

Mark Hoskin | 7 months, 4 weeks ago | read more

The story of 'Closed' funds on Worldwise Investor

The soft closure of the two First State Funds does not mean they are completely closed to new...

Susan Seymour | 9 months ago | read more

Is Environmental Investing Dead in the UK Equity Income Market?

The Multi-Asset approach seems to be a sensibel approach.

There looks to be quite a...

Richard Essex | 9 months ago | read more

Is Environmental Investing Dead in the UK Equity Income Market?

Our view is that multi-asset investing is a very different discipline to long-only equity (which is...

William Buckhurst | 9 months ago | read more

Is Environmental Investing Dead in the UK Equity Income Market?

Has the same sort of definition slipping also happened to Jupiter Ecology? I hope not.

Susan Seymour | 9 months, 1 week ago | read more

» all news discussion




The value of ethical and green investments can go down in value as well as up, so you could get back less than you invest. It is therefore important that you understand the risks of investing. Our aim is to provide you with the best information we can to help you make decisions about ethical and green investments. It is not to advise you on the suitability of an investment to your personal circumstances. Nothing written on the site should be considered personal advice, nor do Holden & Partners accept liability for any inaccurate information on the site. If you are unsure about the suitability of an ethical and green investment please contact Holden & Partners or your financial adviser.

design/build by lexicon

© Worldwise Investor c/o Holden & Partners, The Piano Works, 117 Farringdon Road, London, EC1R 3BX 020 7812 1460 info@worldwiseinvestor.com
Worldwise Investor and Holden & Partners are trading names of Peter.R.T.Holden & Partners LLP regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (446291).